1/17/2024 0 Comments Non euclidean geometry examplesSo it's definitely a grain-of-salt sort of subject. In my experience, any therapist who has studied under a "great" will either espouse the virtue of their mentor's methodology, distance themselves from it, or enter a state of all-out war with it. REBT is a fantastic tool, but I certainly don't think it is THE tool. Whereas thinking rationally allows for emotional interaction with the processing of the logic itself-the emotions don't act as a variable, they act as a component of the logic itself. but that is as a subject of the logical calculus not necessarily a part of it. It is logical to include one's emotions in moments of introspection to allow yourself to experience emotion, to analyze the source, etc. Logical implies a more dispassionate process of consideration. I suspect the word you would want here is actually 'rational' rather than logical. Being absolutely logical would also mean having a balance with emotion, because emotion is essential to our decision making and logic. I don't think it's possible to be too logical. So people often react with 'denial' rather than accept that the contradiction even exists. The stress of questioning reality can genuinely kill a person anxiety will wring you out like a used rag. After all, is it that the non-euclidean object is real, thus changing the definition of what can be a real thing? Or is it that you are losing your mind? Which would draw into question any and every decision you have made while you may have been crazy? To force you to question what qualifies as reality. That's the whole point of existential horror, in fact. You need a firm contradiction like "This thing I'm holding doesn't exist." to actually witness a fight against the reality of the moment. On a 'weak' measure of it, some might call it a 'reality check.' A run-of-the-mill example would be "My son can't be gay." in which a person experiences tremendous existential stress because their perceived reality and their expectation of reality are in conflict. They're prescriptive behaviors or qualities held in the mind. "Jim shouldn't have run over that cat." isn't either, it's expressing a view of wrong-doing, incorrectness, etc. "I should have gotten vanilla instead of chocolate." isn't going against reality, it's regret. Pretty much every time you say "should have" or similar, you're fighting reality.Īctually, in that moment you're regretting that reality didn't match your expectation of reality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |